Sclerophrys superciliaris (Boulenger, 1888)
Cameroon Toad, Horned Toad (English) | family: Bufonidae genus: Sclerophrys |
Species Description: Boulenger, G. A. 1888 "1887". List of the reptiles and batrachians collected by Mr. H. H. Jonston on the Rio del Rey, Cameroons District, W. Africa. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1887: 564–565. |
![]() © 2014 Brian Freiermuth (1 of 17) |
|
|
Description Juveniles have granular skin with warts on the dorsum until they reach about 40 mm in size. Additionally, in small juvenile specimens, the eyelid process is less distinct and is hardly visible. Single tiny bulges are also observed on the eyelids (Barej et al. 2011). DIAGNOSIS: African frogs from the Bufo genus, which S. superciliaris was formerly assigned to, are generally poorly distinguished due to their conservative morphology and conserved karyotypes (Cunningham and Cherry 2004). Sclerophrys superciliaris was previously assigned to both the Bufo and Amietophrynus genera and can be differentiated from species in those genera based on several characteristics. Specificially, adult S. supercilaris have smooth dorsal skin, a straight loreal region, and are larger in size compared to Amietophrynus members (Barej et al. 2011). Compared to other closely related Sclerophrys, in the lateral view, the eyelid process of S. superciliaris is triangular similar to S. channingi but different from the rounded eyelid process of S. chevalieri. Additionally, compared to the broad and rounded tipped parotid glands of S. chevalieri and S. channingi, the parotid glands in S. superciliaris appear slender and have a pointed tip. Furthermore, S. superciliaris can be distinguished by its reddish to reddish-purple flank coloration contrasting it from the brownish flanks of S. channingi and the red to dark purple or purple-brownish flank coloration in S. chevalieri. On the dorsum, S. superciliaris has a pair of spots on a pale background located at the posterior third of the body, differing from S. channingi that displays paired dark spots on a darker posterior dorsal coloration, and S. chevalieri that only has a darker posterior dorsal coloration. Lastly, S. superciliaris differs geographically from the other species. Specifically, S. superciliaris is found in western Lower Guinea whereas S. chevalieri is found in Upper Guinea and S. channingi is found in eastern Lower Guinea (Barej et al. 2011). COLORATION: In life, the dorsal surface coloration varies from a pale yellowish to a marbled orange yellow extending from the tip of the snout to the upper portion of the parotids then posteriorly. The parotids are distinctly bi-colored, with the dorsal surface colored as stated in the previous sentence and the lateral, lower part resembling coloration of the flanks. Starting at the tip of the snout, there is an intense red coloration that may fade in intensity as it continues beneath the canthus rostralis and onto the flanks. A pair of dark spots are present on the posterior third of the dorsum. In a few adult specimens, smaller dark spots may be present on the anterior part of the dorsum or between the eyes. The inguinal region may also have small spots. The limbs are dark purple and the hind limbs and feet have white transverse bars. The gular region and venter are purple and the belly is pale. The anterior extremities are ventrally dark purple (Barej et al. 2011). In life, the juveniles have a similar coloration to the adults, but have additional transversal bars on the tibiofibula. Additionally, more spots are present on the dorsum and in the interorbital region. In the interorbital region, a pair of small blotches converge posteriorly with each other, barely reaching the eyelids. Some juveniles have lighter vertebral lines. Juveniles also have a brown-black coloration in the gular and chest region, in contrast to adults with pale bellies (Barej et al. 2011). In preservative, specimens lose their reddish coloration and fade to brownish. The reddish coloration is only retained where it is covered between skin folds. While older specimens are usually bleached out, resulting in the lack of color pattern, there are still many specimens where the lateral and dorsal coloration is distinguishable (Barej et al. 2011). VARIATION: A female observed in 1898 was described to have a pale red-brown upper surface and chocolate-brown flanks, however, it is unclear if this specimen was of S. superciliaris (Barej et al. 2011). Distribution and Habitat Country distribution from AmphibiaWeb's database: Cameroon, Central African Republic, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Nigeria
Life History, Abundance, Activity, and Special Behaviors Breeding males were observed to have hypertrophied anterior limbs and black callosities on fingers I and II (Barej et al. 2011). Sclerophyrs superciliaris males do not have a vocal sac and have not been observed to have an advertisement call. However, a dull, buzzing vocalization consisting of a long series of pulses that lasted for 1.0 to 1.5 seconds has been recorded. Only the flanks were observed to be moving during this vocalization, which could only be heard from short distances. As a result, the researchers concluded the vocalization is only useful for short distance recognition rather than as an advertisement call (Barej et al. 2011). Clutches of S. superciliaris eggs are deposited in slowly running streams. The egg sizes range from 1.40 mm to 1.95 mm. Reproduction is believed to occur during the dry season, from January to March, as most specimens are observed during this period, and with males displaying their nuptial morphology. In January, juveniles of the species were observed in both Nigeria and Cameroon (Barej et al. 2011). In captivity, the species feeds on insects, snails, beef meat, and on other frogs and tadpoles (Barej et al. 2011). Trends and Threats Relation to Humans Possible reasons for amphibian decline Habitat modification from deforestation, or logging related activities Comments Barej et al. (2011) re-categorized the focal taxon to the genus Amietophrynus and differentiated it through various characteristics. However, based on morphology, Ohler and Dubois (2016) re-assigned it again to Sclerophyrs. OTHER INTERESTING INFORMATION: Between 2011 and 2019, Sclerophrys chevalieri was treated as a subspecies of S. superciliaris, however, Barej et al. (2011) also noted that while the two species are similar genetically, they are morphologically and geographically distinct. In 2019, Rödel and Glos treated Sclerophrys chevalieri and S. superciliaris as two different species. References Cunningham, M., and Cherry, M. I. (2004). Molecular systematics of African 20-chromosome toads (Anura: Bufonidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 32(3), 671–685. [link] IUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group. (2019). Sclerophrys superciliaris. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: e.T46203837A16215747. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-1.RLTS.T46203837A16215747.en. Accessed in April 2025. Ohler, A., and A. Dubois. 2016. The identity of the South African toad Sclerophrys capensis Tschudi, 1838 (Amphibia, Anura). PeerJ 4(e1553): 1–13. [link] Rödel, M.-O., and J. Glos. 2019. Herpetological surveys in two proposed protected areas in Liberia, West Africa. Zoosystematics and Evolution 95, 15–35. [link]
Originally submitted by: Najwa Dabbagh (2025-06-03) Description by: Najwa Dabbagh (updated 2025-06-03)
Distribution by: Najwa Dabbagh (updated 2025-06-03)
Life history by: Najwa Dabbagh (updated 2025-06-03)
Trends and threats by: Najwa Dabbagh (updated 2025-06-03)
Relation to humans by: Najwa Dabbagh (updated 2025-06-03)
Comments by: Najwa Dabbagh (updated 2025-06-03)
Edited by: Ann T. Chang (2025-06-03) Species Account Citation: AmphibiaWeb 2025 Sclerophrys superciliaris: Cameroon Toad <https://amphibiaweb.org/species/287> University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. Accessed Jun 9, 2025.
Feedback or comments about this page.
Citation: AmphibiaWeb. 2025. <https://amphibiaweb.org> University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. Accessed 9 Jun 2025. AmphibiaWeb's policy on data use. |