Platypelis laetus
| family: Microhylidae subfamily: Cophylinae genus: Platypelis |
Species Description: Rakotoarison A, MD Scherz, J Köhler, FM Ratsoavina, O Hawlitschek, S Megson, M Vences, and F Glaw. 2020. Frogs of the genus Platypelis from the Sorata massif in northern Madagascar: description of a new species and reports of range extensions. Zoosystematics and Evolution 96: 263-274. | |
Etymology: The species epithet “laetus,” comes from the Latin adjective for “happy” or “lucky” and was named so to reflect the happiness and joy that the first author had when working with the frogs in Madagascar (Rakotoarison et al. 2020). |
|
|
Description DIAGNOSIS: Platypelis laetus can be differentiated from other species such as P. grandis, P. alticola, P. pollicaris, P. tuberifera, and P. cowanii by its relatively smaller size. Compared to P. tetra, P. barbouri, P. karenae, P. ravus, and P. ando, P. laetus is larger. It can be further distinguished from P. grandis by having smooth skin on its dorsal surface; from P. tuberifera by its dark dorsal pattern on a not flattened body; from P. pollicaris and P. mavomavo by having a third toe that is relatively shorter than the fifth; from P. tsaratananaensis by having a larger, rounded body and no vomerine teeth; from P. milloti by having a green throat and no red ventral color as well as a specific pattern on its back; and from P. barbouri and P. ranjomena by having no red color on its ventral nor its limbs. Platypelis laetus can be distinguished by its short call of 73 - 83 ms compared to that of P. alticola, P. ando, P. barbouri, P. karenae, P. pollicaris, P. ranjomena, P. ravus, P. tuberifera, C. berara, C. fortuna, C. maharipeo, C. noromalalae, C. occultans, C. phyllodactyla, and C. puellarum. Platypelis milloti have shorter calls than P. laetus (Rakotoarison et al. 2020). COLORATION: In preservation, the dorsum is a light beige color. There may be a brown, teddy-bear-shaped patch speckled by cream color that starts between the eyes and goes down to the inguinal region. At the nostril, there is a lot of brown. The lateral surface is light beige and is dotted with small browns. This coloration continues to the ventral side and the chin. Its arms have brown crossbands on a background of beige. On the thigh, the dorsal surface is beige with light brown crossbands, the posterodorsal side is beige speckled with light brown and the ventral surface is beige, but is speckled with brown in the cloacal region. The ventral surfaces of the shank, tarsus, and foot are beige (Rakotoarison et al. 2020). Photos of coloration in life can be found in Rakotoarison et al. (2020). VARIATION: Variation between the holotype and two male paratypes are overall consistent. However, while holotype had a plump body and a teddy-bear pattern on the dorsum, a skinny paratype without the pattern was also present. Relative toe length is also variable, with the third toe being both distinctly and only slightly shorter than the fifth. In life, the dorsal surface may have irregular granules. And lastly, in preservative, the individuals may vary in the darkness of coloration (Rakotoarison et al. 2020). Distribution and Habitat Country distribution from AmphibiaWeb's database: Madagascar
Life History, Abundance, Activity, and Special Behaviors Male P. laetus have been observed to begin calling around dusk. Their advertisement calls are distinguished as a single short tonal note that is repeated at consistent intervals over a long period of time. Calls were observed at 15°C and lasted 73 - 88 ms (83.4 ± 4.3 ms) at a dominant frequency of 4707 - 4793 Hz (4742 ± 38 Hz) and had an inter-note interval of 1465 - 2378 ms (1940 ± 255 ms) (Rakotoarison et al. 2020). Eggs that are presumed to belong to P. laetus have been found in water-filled bamboo nodes. These eggs are white and at least two different developmental stages have been documented in the same hole at the same time (Rakotoarison et al. 2020). Larva Whitish tadpoles, which are presumed to be P. laetus, were found in a water-filled bamboo node that was 1 m from the ground with an adult (Rakotoarison et al. 2020). Trends and Threats Possible reasons for amphibian decline Intensified agriculture or grazing Comments PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS: The use of Maximum Likelihood analysis of 16S and RAG-1 showed that P. laetus is likely part of the P. olgae glade. More specifically, P. laetus was most closely related to an undescribed species from Andravory. The next most closely related species is also undescribed and from Sorata, followed by P. olgae (Rakotoarison et al. 2020).References Originally submitted by: Stephen Song (2024-07-02) Description by: Stephen Song, Ann T. Chang (updated 2024-07-02)
Distribution by: Stephen Song (updated 2024-07-02)
Life history by: Stephen Song (updated 2024-07-02)
Larva by: Stephen Song (updated 2024-07-02)
Trends and threats by: Stephen Song (updated 2024-07-02)
Comments by: Stephen Song, Ann T. Chang (updated 2024-07-02)
Edited by: Ann T. Chang (2024-08-22) Species Account Citation: AmphibiaWeb 2024 Platypelis laetus <https://amphibiaweb.org/species/9199> University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. Accessed Oct 11, 2024.
Feedback or comments about this page.
Citation: AmphibiaWeb. 2024. <https://amphibiaweb.org> University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. Accessed 11 Oct 2024. AmphibiaWeb's policy on data use. |