Ranitomeya variabilis (Zimmermann & Zimmermann, 1988)
Variable Poison Frog, Splash-back Poison Frog
|Species Description: Zimmermann H and Zimmermann E. 1988. Etho-Taxonomie und zoogeographische Artengruppenbildung bei Pfeilgiftfroschen (Anura: Dendrobatidae). Salamandra 24:125–160.|
© 2011 John P. Clare (1 of 19)
Diagnosis: R. imitator is a Müllerian mimic of R. variabilis. R. variabilis can be differentiated from R. imitator by egg coloration, vocalization, and subtle coloration differences (Schulte et al. 2001; Schulte et al. 2003). Additionally, R. variabilis is a color and pattern variant of R. ventrimaculata (Schulte et al. 2002).
Coloration: Coloration changes on a gradient from the anterior to posterior, going from a yellow-green to a blue-green. This species has a single nose spot with large, ovid dorsal spotting. Limbs are less than half black with small, even spots (Brown et al. 2008).
Distribution and Habitat
Country distribution from AmphibiaWeb's database: Colombia, Ecuador, Peru
R. variabilis is semi-arboreal and lives in secondary to old growth forests and is restricted to the summits of mid-level mountains roughly 900-1200 m above sea level (Brown et al. 2008; Schulte et al. 2002; Icochea 2004). Frogs are found in the understory, canopy, usually above ground on vertical objects, and sometimes in leaf litter (Brown et al. 2008) Despite the frogs’ utilization of pools, R. variabilis is not restricted to areas with certain vegetation or the presence of phytotelmata. (Brown et al. 2009a).
Life History, Abundance, Activity, and Special Behaviors
Males have short buzz-like calls that are relatively low. When a female is present, a male will call from an elevated perch and increase his call rate as she approaches; he then leads her to the breeding site. The call is repeated when a suitable breeding site is reached. Males only called during courtship. (Brown et al. 2008).
The female lays 2-6 eggs under the surface of the water, in pools that collect in the axils of plants. The male fertilizes them by placing his vent against that of the female (facing opposite directions) while she is laying the eggs, or simply by walking over the already laid eggs. This ritual is performed in pairs or sometimes groups where aggressive male competition has been observed (Brown et al. 2008).
Reproduction occurs during the day and has been seen to peak after rain (Brown et al. 2008). The pools chosen for oviposition, are small to medium sized compared to medium sized pools chosen for tadpole deposition (Brown et al. 2009a).
Average clutch size is 4 to 5 eggs, which hatch into free-living, lentic larvae; the development period lasts 12 to 14 days depending on the temperature (Masche et al. 2010).
Parental care in R. variabilis is restricted to males only and since males cannot provide the tadpoles with trophic eggs, one of the biggest constraints on the tadpoles is food availability. Males return to the pool to transport tadpoles to reduce predation, and competition. The male tears open the embryo sac, using his rear legs. The tadpoles then either wriggle onto his back or are pushed on by the male’s rear legs. Males will carry 1 to 6 tadpoles at a time and place them either in their own individual pool or communally in one pool. However, not all males provide parental care (Brown et al. 2009b).
There are costs associated with tadpole distribution. Small pool size may cause an increase in intraspecific and interspecific competition for food. This poses a tradeoff between safety from predators and nutrient availability, as tadpoles in small pools are more susceptible to starvation (Brown et al. 2009a).
Males may selectively deposit their tadpoles into pools already occupied by unrelated individuals, exhibiting tactical reproductive parasitism (Brown et al. 2009b). Multiple depositions into the same pool will select for tadpoles that compete vigorously and resist cannibalism from conspecifics (Brown et al. 2009a).
The caudal musculature of the tadpoles is narrow near the posterior tail tip and becomes moderately robust near the anterior. Fins do not extend onto the body of the tadpole and are subequal in height. The caudal fin tip is rounded and there is an anteroventrally directed mouth with an emarginated oral disc. There is a single row of 32 marginal papillae surrounding the oral disk and there are no submarginal papillae. On the marginal papillae of the lips there are two gaps: a small medial gap on the posterior lip and a large medial gap on the anterior lip. Two anterior rows of teeth are not completely keratinized and are equal in length. The upper jaw sheath has slender lateral processes but, like the V-shaped lower jaw sheath, it is moderately robust with serrated edges over its entire length (Masche et al. 2010).
Tadpole Coloration: The tadpoles have grey to dark black-brownish pigmentation (Brown et al. 2008b ; Masche et al. 2010). A single nose spot is present, differentiating the species from R. imitator which has a paired nose spot. In both dorsal and lateral profiles, the snout is rounded (Brown et al. 2008).
Trends and Threats
Possible reasons for amphibian decline
Habitat modification from deforestation, or logging related activities
Brown, J. L., Morales, V., and Summers, K. (2009). ''Home range size and location in relation to reproductive resources in poison (Dendrobatidae): a Monte Carlo approach using GIS data.'' Animal Behaviour, 77, 547-554.
Brown, J. L., Morales, V., and Summers, K. (2009). ''Tactical reproductive parasitism via larval cannibalism in Peruvian poison frogs.'' Biology Letters, 5(2), 148-151.
Brown, J. L., Morales, V., and Summers, K. (2008). ''Divergence in parental care, habitat selection and larval life history between two species of Peruvian poison frogs: an experimental analysis.'' Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21, 1534-1543.
Brown, J. L., Twomey, E., Morales, V., and Summers, K. (2008). ''Phytotelm size in relation to parental care and mating strategies in two species of Peruvian poison frogs.'' Behaviour, 145, 1139-1165.
Frost, D. (2011). Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 5.5.
Icochea, J., and Jungfer, K.-H. (2004). Ranitomeya variabilis. In: IUCN 2010. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2010.4. www.iucnredlist.org. Downloaded April 2011.
Masche, S., Zimmermann, H., and Pröhl, H. (2010). ''Description and ecological observations of the tadpole of Ranitomeya variabilis (Anura: Dendrobatidae).'' South American Journal of Herpetology, 5(3), 207-211.
Schulte, R., Summers, K. and Symula, R (2001). ''Molecular phylogenetic evidence for a mimetic radiation in Peruvian poison frogs supports a Müllerian mimicry hypothesis.'' Biological Sciences, 268, 2415-2421.
Schulte, R., Summers, K., and Symula, R. (2003). ''Molecular systematics and phylogeography of Amazonian poison frogs of the genus Dendrobates.'' Molecular Phylogenectics and Evolution, 26, 452-475.
Originally submitted by: Monique Sanchez, Rebecca Knapp, and Andrea Bondelie (first posted 2010-09-30)
Edited by: Mingna (Vicky) Zhuang, Michelle S. Koo (2022-08-15)
Species Account Citation: AmphibiaWeb 2022 Ranitomeya variabilis: Variable Poison Frog <https://amphibiaweb.org/species/6117> University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. Accessed Oct 1, 2022.
Feedback or comments about this page.
Citation: AmphibiaWeb. 2022. <https://amphibiaweb.org> University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. Accessed 1 Oct 2022.
AmphibiaWeb's policy on data use.