Little-devil poison frog, Kiki
© 2016 Gustavo Adolfo Pisso-Florez (1 of 9)
There is a single oval palmar tubercle on the palm along with easily visible, but not strongly developed subarticular tubercles on the fingers. Their finger I reaches the base of the disk of finger II, while finger II reaches to the second joint of finger III. Finger IV reaches slightly farther on finger III than it does finger II, giving a relative finger length of I < II < IV< III. The width of disks II, III, and IV are equal and about twice the width of their digits. The disk of finger I is narrower and about one and half times the width of the digits. The fingers are all free of webbing (Funkhouser 1956).
The snout to vent length is slightly more than four times the width of the sacrum. The heels overlap slightly when the legs are folded at right angles to the body. When the hind limbs are adpressed along the body the tibiotarsal articulation reaches the posterior corner of the eye. The tibia is longer than the femur and the foot is nearly twice the length of the tibia. There is a round outer metatarsal tubercle, an elliptic inner metatarsal tubercle, and an indistinct tarsal tubercle on the foot. The first toe reaches the first joint of toe II. Toe II reaches the midpoint of the first joint of toe III. Toe III reaches to the last subarticular tubercle of IV and is about two-thirds the length of toe IV. Toe V reaches just below the second subarticular tubercle of IV giving a relative toe length of I < II < V < III < IV. The disk of toe I is only slightly wider than the toe and is about half as wide as the disk of toe II and III, which are both almost twice as wide as toe II. The disk of toe IV is about equal to that of toe III. The disk of toe V is about one and a half times as wide as the toe and about two-thirds the widths of II, III, and IV. The weakly developed subarticular tubercles are nonetheless easily discernable (Funkhouser 1956).
The skin is smooth on all the surfaces (Funkhouser 1956).
Oophaga sylvatica is distinguished from most other western Ecuadorian dendrobatids by being the largest species. The most physically similar species is the Colombian O. histrionicus, from which O. sylvatica was split. The two can be distinguished by call and patterning. The markings on O. sylvatica are more irregular with indistinct margins that may merge together while O. histrionicus has well delimited markings (Funkhouser 1956, Ortiz et al. 2018). The call of O. sylvatica is most similar to O. lehmanni and O. occultator but they differ in that O. sylvatica has a longer note duration, lower minimum frequency, and a lower dominate frequency than O. lehmanni. Additionally, O. sylvatica has a longer note duration, longer inter-note duration, lower minimum frequency, and lower dominate frequency than O. occultator (Lotter et al. 1999)
In life, the dorsum ranges from gray, brown, orange, red, or black with whitish, yellow, orange, red, or light blue spots or reticulated markings. Spots often blur into the background color. Ventral coloration can be similar to the dorsum or red. Markings may be present or absent on the limbs, but when they are present, they are large with defined margins (Ortiz et al. 2018).
In preservative, the main coloration is grey-black and the markings are a lighter grey. For the dorsal markings are closely spaces with small irregular outlines that tend to merge or blend into the background. The ventral markings are larger and have a smoother outline but can be irregular in their shape and size. The limb markings may be present or absent, however when they are present the are usually large with smooth margins (Funkhouser 1956).
Funkhouser (1956) noted that the coloration and markings were similar in paratypes when he first described them. However, later specimens showed variation in both with some populations having the black background with reddish brown spots or large blue circles, while others are completely black, have orange or reddish coloration (Ortiz et al. 2018).
Distribution and Habitat
Country distribution from AmphibiaWeb's database: Colombia, Ecuador
Life History, Abundance, Activity, and Special Behaviors
Oophaga sylvatica tends to blend in with the red fungus that grows on the jungle floor (Funkhouser 1956).
Male vocalizations occur from between 6 in the morning and 7 in the evening. Their call is described as similar to the sound made by a wood borer in dead wood (Funkhouser 1956). Recordings were made from a captive individual at a temperature of 23.0o C. The note duration was 86 – 100 ms and consisted of 16 – 21 pulses. There are 5 – 6 note repetitions with 100 – 121ms between notes. The frequency range is between 800 – 3000 Hz with dominate frequencies between 1750 – 1950 and 2300 – 2450 Hz (Lotters et al. 1999).
In the southern part of the species' range, mating does not occur during the reduced rainy season from July to November. There is no amplexus during mating. The male instead deposits his sperm on the ground before females deposit her eggs on top. Males care for the eggs, but females transport tadpoles, on the females' back, after hatching to bromeliads or other phytotelmatas where they complete their development, which lasts 6 - 8 weeks (Ortiz et al. 2018, IUCN 2019).
The female feeds the tadpoles infertile eggs and gravid females have been found to have 30 - 46 eggs (Ortiz et al. 2018). There is evidence that maternal provisioning of unfertilized eggs also transfers chemical defenses to the tadpoles (Fischer et al. 2019).
Oophaga sylvatica diet is based on ants (Ortiz et al. 2018).
Trends and Threats
Threats to this species include habitat loss, exploitation by the pet trade, and disease (chytridiomicosis). Habitat is lost to agricultural development, logging, mining, human settlements, and pollution (Ortiz et al. 2018, IUCN 2019).
Some populations occur in protected areas in Ecuador, such as La Perla Protected Forest, Río Palenque Scientific Center, Bilsa Biological Station, La Chiquita Wildlife Refuge, Mache Chindul Ecological Reserve, Mayronga Reserve, and Río Canandé Reserve (Ortiz et al. 2018). The species was formerly common in the Reserva Biotopo Selva Humeda, Colombia, but was not found during extensive surveys in 2006. As of 2016, the species is still common in Divisio and Iscuandé, Department of Nariño, Colombia (IUCN 2019).
Relation to Humans
When first described, Funkhouser (1956) thought O. sylvatica was a subspecies of O. histrionicus (originally named Dendrobates histrionicus sylvaticus) due to similar coloration, proximity of the populations. The species was moved from the genus Dendrobates to Oophaga following morphological analysis by Grant et al. (2006). Oophaga sylvatica was joined in this genus by O. arborea, O. granulifera, O. histrionica, O. lehmanni, O. occultator, O. pumilio, O. speciosa, and O. vicentei. Later call analysis by Lotters et al. (1999) found that the call of O. sylvatica most closely resembled O. lehmanniand O. occultator rather than O. histrionicus. This was supported by analyses from Santos et al. (2009) who used Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian Inference on a tree matrix of multiple genes, including 12s and 16s mtDNA and Rag-1 nuclear DNA, to conclude that the sister species of O. sylvatica is O. lehmanni.
A population genetics study, using Bayesian analysis of CO1, 16S, 12S mitochondrial, and Rag-1, TYR, and NCX nuclear sequences, found that O. sylvatica is split into two distinct lineages: one north of the Santiago River drainage, and one south. High genetic and morphological variation in the north suggest that there is ongoing gene flow in that lineage, while low genetic variation in the south suggests that those populations are the result of recent range expansions from the northern lineage (Roland et al. 2017).
The origin of the genus name, Oophaga, comes from the Greek words, "oon" and "phagein", meaning "egg" and "eat", respectively (Ortiz et al. 2018).
The species epithet, "sylvatica", is from the Latin words, "silvae", which refers to the species' presence in lowland tropical forests (Ortiz et al. 2018).
This species was featured as News of the Week on January 21, 2020:
Parenting is an uncommon strategy among amphibians to raise offspring, and rarely takes the form of intense care compared to other vertebrates. For example, when species diversified and gained new niches to avoid competition for the same resources, maternal provisioning provides evolutionary benefits to surpass the cost of reduced access to nutrients. Fischer et al. 2019 demonstrated that in addition to supplying nutrients to offspring living in small isolated pools of water, maternal provisioning of unfertilized eggs is a way of passing along chemical defenses in some aposematic and poisonous frogs species. This mechanism of toxin transfer convergently evolved in two distant clades of frogs living in the antipodes, the Malagasy Climbing Mantella (Mantella laevigata) and the Ecuadorian Little Devil Poison Frog (Oophaga sylvatica), which diverged roughly 140 million years ago. Further, they showed that the neuronal basis of their maternal behavior relies on similar brain region activities but with distinct activation patterns, suggesting an evolutionary versatility in the molecular mechanisms sustaining maternal provisioning (Written by Alexandre B. Roland).
Funkhouser, J.W. (1956). "New frogs from Ecuador and southwestern Colombia." Zoologica: scientific contributions of the New York Zoological Society, 41(9), 73-80. [link]
Grant, T., Frost, D. R., Caldwell, J. P., Gagliardo, R., Haddad, C. F. B., Kok, P. J. R., Means, D. B., Noonan, B. P., Schargel, W. E., and Wheeler, W. C. (2006). ''Phylogenetic systematics of dart-poison frogs and their relatives (Amphibia: Athesphatanura: Dendrobatidae).'' Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, (299), 1-262.
IUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group 2019. Oophaga sylvatica. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: e.T55203A85887077. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-2.RLTS.T55203A85887077.en. Downloaded on 30 March 2020.
Lötters, S., Glaw, F., Köhler, J., and Castro, F. (1999). ''On the geographic variation of the advertisement call of Dendrobates histrionicus and related forms from north-western South America.'' Herpetozoa, 12(1/2), 23-38.
Mechanisms of convergent egg provisioning in poison frogs [link]
Ortiz, DA, Coloma, LA, Frenkel, C. and Pazmiño-Armijos, G. 2018. Oophaga sylvatica In: Ron, SR, Merino-Viteri, A. Ortiz, DA (Eds). Amphibians of Ecuador. Version 2019.0. Museum of Zoology, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador. https://bioweb.bio/faunaweb/amphibiaweb/FichaEspecie/Oophaga%20sylvatica , accessed Thursday, January 28, 202
Roland, A.B., Santos, J.C., Carriker, B.C., Caty, S.N, Tapia, E.E., Coloma, L.A., O’Connell, L.A. (2017). "Radiation of the polymorphic Little Devil poison frog (Oophaga sylvatica) in Ecuador." Ecology and Evolution , 7(22), 9750-9762. [link]
Santos, JC, Coloma, LA, Summers, K, Caldwell, JP, Ree, R, Cannatella, DC (2010). "Correction: Amazonian amphibian diversity is primarily derived from late Miocene Andean lineages." PLOS Biology , 8(9), 10.1371. [link]
Originally submitted by: Maxine Weber (2021-03-22)
Description by: Maxine Weber (updated 2021-03-22)
Distribution by: Maxine Weber (updated 2021-03-22)
Life history by: Maxine Weber (updated 2021-03-22)
Trends and threats by: Maxine Weber (updated 2021-03-22)
Relation to humans by: Maxine Weber (updated 2021-03-22)
Comments by: Maxine Weber (updated 2021-03-22)
Edited by: Ann T. Chang (2021-03-22)
Species Account Citation: AmphibiaWeb 2021 Oophaga sylvatica: Little-devil poison frog <https://amphibiaweb.org/species/5910> University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. Accessed May 11, 2021.
Feedback or comments about this page.
Citation: AmphibiaWeb. 2021. <https://amphibiaweb.org> University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. Accessed 11 May 2021.
AmphibiaWeb's policy on data use.