AMPHIBIAWEB
Plethodon petraeus
Pigeon Mountain Salamander
Subgenus: Plethodon
family: Plethodontidae
subfamily: Plethodontinae

© 2010 Todd Pierson (1 of 29)
Conservation Status (definitions)
IUCN (Red List) Status Vulnerable (VU)
NatureServe Status Use NatureServe Explorer to see status.
CITES No CITES Listing
Other International Status None
National Status None
Regional Status None

Country distribution from AmphibiaWeb's database: United States

 

View distribution map using BerkeleyMapper.

   

bookcover The following account is modified from Amphibian Declines: The Conservation Status of United States Species, edited by Michael Lannoo (©2005 by the Regents of the University of California), used with permission of University of California Press. The book is available from UC Press.

Plethodon petraeus Wynn, Highton and Jacobs, 1988
Pigeon Mountain Salamander

John B. Jensen1
Carlos D. Camp2

1. Historical versus Current Distribution. Pigeon Mountain salamanders (Plethodon petraeus) are known only from the eastern slope of Pigeon Mountain in northwestern Georgia (Wynn et al., 1988). The original description reported them from only two sites, both in Walker County (Wynn et al., 1988). Since that time, several additional sites have been discovered on Pigeon Mountain, including one in Chattooga County (Highton, 1995a; Buhlmann, 1996; J.B.J. and C.D.C., unpublished data).

2. Historical versus Current Abundance. Wynn et al. (1988) reported the species as abundant, far outnumbering other syntopic salamander species. Recent surveys at two of the known sites indicated no detectable change in their abundance (Buhlmann, 1996; J.B.J., personal observations), however Pigeon Mountain salamanders have become uncommon at one locality, possibly due to disturbance created by increased cave visitation and/or perhaps scientific over-collection (Jensen, 1999a).

3. Life History Features.

A. Breeding. Reproduction is terrestrial.

i. Breeding migrations. Mating and migratory behavior unknown.

ii. Breeding habitat. Breeding and nest sites unknown.

B. Eggs.

i. Egg deposition sites. Unknown, but likely in caves (Jensen et al., 2002).

ii. Clutch size. Based on the number of developing oocytes found in dissected, mature females, Jensen et al. (2002) determined an average clutch size of 19.3.

C. Direct Development. As a member of the genus Plethodon, direct development of Pigeon Mountain salamanders is assumed, however eggs and hatchlings are unknown.

D. Juvenile Habitat. Thought to be the same as adult habitat.

E. Adult Habitat. Pigeon Mountain salamanders are associated with limestone outcroppings, boulder fields, and caves (Wynn et al., 1988). Those found in caves are rarely deeper than the twilight zone. Individuals are most often found in and around cracks and crevices within rocks. These microhabitats are embedded within mesic deciduous forests consisting of an overstory comprised primarily of oak and hickory (Jensen, 1999a). However, Pigeon Mountain salamanders are rarely encountered away from rock outcrops or caves (Jensen et al., 2002).

F. Home Range Size. Unknown.

G. Territories. Unknown.

H. Aestivation/Avoiding Dessication. Little is known, although individuals are difficult to find during extremely dry conditions (J.B.J., personal observations).

I. Seasonal Migrations. Unknown.

J. Torpor (Hibernation). Little is known, although individuals are difficult to find during winter (Jensen, 1999a).

K. Interspecific Associations/Exclusions. Unknown, however aggressive interference is common among other species of Plethodon, and laboratory trials involving Pigeon Mountain salamanders and sympatric northern slimy salamanders (Plethodon glutinosus) revealed territorial defense and aggression (J.L. Marshall, C.D.C., and R.G. Jaeger, unpublished data). In addition to northern slimy salamanders, other salamanders often found in the same microhabitats include cave salamanders (Eurycea lucifuga), long-tailed salamanders (E. longicauda), southern zigzag salamanders (P. ventralis), and green salamanders (Aneides aeneus; Jensen et al., 2002).

L. Age/Size at Reproductive Maturity. Females mature at a larger size (≥ 65 mm SVL) than males (≥ 56 mm) and grow to a greater maximum size (85 mm for females, 80 mm for males). Males mature at a minimum of 3 yr, females at 4 yr (Jensen et al., 2002).

M. Longevity. Unknown.

N. Feeding Behavior. Jensen and Whiles (2000) found ants and beetles to be especially important prey items, though many other invertebrates also are consumed. While Pigeon Mountain salamanders are often opportunistic feeders “sitting and waiting” for prey (J.B.J., personal observations), the presence in dissected stomachs of larval beetles and flies associated with rotting logs, dung, and other moist substrates indicates that prey are also actively searched for and removed from such substrates. Larval insects associated with small, stagnant pools of water are also found in dissected stomachs, suggesting that Pigeon Mountain salamanders also forage in aquatic microhabitats.

O. Predators. Unknown.

P. Anti-Predator Mechanisms. Pigeon Mountain salamanders produce slimy tail secretions, similar to those found in the Plethodon glutinosus complex, that may be noxious or irritating to predators (J.B.J., personal observations).

Q. Diseases. Unknown.

R. Parasites. Unknown.

4. Conservation. Listed as Rare and thus protected by the State of Georgia. The restricted distribution of Pigeon Mountain salamanders makes them especially vulnerable to threats. The vast majority of their range is under public ownership as the Crockford-Pigeon Mountain Wildlife Management Area. However, mineral rights to a portion of this property are leased to a mining company that has proposed quarrying operations, which may threaten both this species and green salamanders, another rare amphibian. Over-collection for scientific study and possibly the illegal pet trade, as well as disturbance from recreational spelunkers, may threaten populations. Loss or reduction of moisture-trapping canopy cover as a result of timber removal on private lands could pose a future threat.

1John B. Jensen
Nongame-Endangered Wildlife Program
Georgia Department of Natural Resources
116 Rum Creek Drive
Forsyth, Georgia 31029
John_Jensen@dnr.state.ga.us

2Carlos D. Camp
Department of Biology
Piedmont College
Demorest, Georgia 30535
ccamp@piedmont.edu



Literature references for Amphibian Declines: The Conservation Status of United States Species, edited by Michael Lannoo, are here.

Feedback or comments about this page.

 

Citation: AmphibiaWeb. 2018. <http://amphibiaweb.org> University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. Accessed 14 Nov 2018.

AmphibiaWeb's policy on data use.