Goliath frog, Giant frog
© 2019 Marvin Schäfer and Frogs & Friends e.V. (1 of 51)
The species description by Boulenger (1906 - Annals) was based on one specimen. The depressed head is wider than long with an obtusely pointed snout. The nostril is closer to the snout tip than the eye. The canthus rostralis is obtuse and the loreal region is deeply grooved. The interorbital space is shorter than the length of the upper eyelid. The tympanum is small relative to the large head, and bordered above by a prominent fold or ridge. The short fingers each have one large, flat, oval subarticular tubercle. The first and second fingers are about equal and the third is longer than the fourth (Boulenger 1906 - Annals). The hindlimbs are powerful and long relative to the body length (~150% of snout–vent length; Sabater-Pi 1985). When extended along the body, the tibiotarsal articulation reaches the tip of the snout. The feet are as long as the crus (Boulenger 1906 - Annals) and fully webbed with relatively thick interdigital membranes extending along the full length of the toes and ending at the disc-like toe tips (see photograph in Zahl 1967). The foot has a flat, elliptical inner metatarsal tubercle and no outer tubercle. As with the fingers, the moderate toes have large, flat, oval subarticular tubercles. There is a strong dermal fringe on the outer side of the fifth toe (Boulenger 1906 - Annals). The skin on the dorsum and on top of the limbs is granular with many fine ridges (Pawley 1987). The flanks have small warts. The upper surface of the thighs and tibias have longitudinal granular folds. The belly and throat also have small granules (Boulenger 1906 - Annals).
Tadpoles have robust and muscular tails and mouths with prominent, heavily keratinized jaw sheaths, 7 rows of keratodonts surrounding the mouth (keratodont formula: 7(5 – 7)/7(1)), and many small papillae, especially around lateral and ventral borders (Lamotte et al. 1959; Channing et al. 2012). The straight, short spiracular tube is located on the left side of the posterior half of the body. The vent tube is nearly one-third the length of the body and opens on the right side of the ventral fin (Channing et al. 2012).
In life, the background dorsal coloration ranges from dark green to orangey green with darker spots on the dorsum. There are irregular cross-bars on the limbs and the posterior surface of the hindlimbs are blackish with white spots. The abdomen and ventral part of the limbs are yellowish orange (Boulenger 1906 - Annals; Channing and Rödel 2019).
Conraua goliath can be differentiated from Conraua robusta, the only other large Conraua that co-occurs with C. goliath, via the ventral coloration, which is white or gray in C. robusta (Channing and Rödel 2019).
In life, the coloration of the body of tadpoles is a somber grey with darker round spots on the dorsal surface, with equally large but more irregular spots on the tail. The spiracular tube is unpigmented (Lamotte et al. 1959; Channing et al. 2012).
Distribution and Habitat
Country distribution from AmphibiaWeb's database: Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea
Adult goliath frogs are found in rapids and cascades of rivers with a sandy bottom and clean, slightly tannic, cool (16 – 22 C), oxygen-rich waters (Sabater-Pi 1962, 1985; Zahl 1967). Typically, these rivers are large enough to not be enclosed within the forest canopy (Amiet 1986).
Life History, Abundance, Activity, and Special Behaviors
In Río Muni of Equatorial Guinea, reproduction occurs during the dry season (July and August) as well as during the short dry season of December and January (Zahl 1967).
Egg masses are deposited underwater and attached to vegetation or stones in pools near rapids (Sabater-Pi 1985; Channing and Rödel 2019). In some cases, frogs (likely males) create nests in existing pools and washouts that may be expanded, whereas in others frogs actively dig depressions into the gravel banks of rivers (Schäfer et al. 2019). In all cases, these pools and depressions are actively cleaned of leaf litter and detritus by the frogs. Most nests contain 150 – 350 eggs, though in some cases might have as many as 2,800 eggs (Schäfer et al. 2019). Multiple nests may be deposited in these pools and depressions, with up to three cohorts of tadpoles being involved in some nests, and tadpoles appear to finish development within these nests (Schäfer et al. 2019). Larval development takes approximately 3 months to go through metamorphosis (Zahl 1967; Sabater-Pi 1985). Female frogs attend these nests for some period of time after oviposition (Schäfer et al. 2019).
Sabater-Pi (1985) reported that tadpoles of C. goliath feed on the leaves of the aquatic plant “Dicraea warmingii”; the genus Dicraea is currently considered a junior synonym of the genus Podostemum (Podostemaceae), which does not occur in Africa, and the taxon to which Sabater-Pi (1985) is likely referring, Inversodicraea warmingiana, a high elevation Angolan endemic. Thus, the identify of this aquatic plant remains unknown, though is plausibly a member of the Podostemaceae (M. Cheek, pers. comm. to D.C. Blackburn). Freshwater shrimp have been observed feeding on eggs of C. goliath within the nests constructed by adults (Schäfer et al. 2019).
The diets of adults include insects (beetles, ants, dragonflies, caddisflies), millipedes, freshwater shrimp, spiders, scorpions, freshwater snails, as well as larval and adult anurans (Perret 1957, 1960; Sabater-Pi 1962, 1967, 1985; Gewalt 1977). In captivity, when fed young mice, frogs have been observed to feed out of the water, though will also feed while their bodies are submerged in the water, capturing prey on the water’s surface (Pawley 1987). Suction-feeding, however, has not been reported in these aquatic frogs.
Despite previous assertions that adults do not call (Perret 1957; Sabater-Pi, 1985), C. goliath has a repertoire of call types, including brief whistles, chirping, and even a “sighing deep roar” (Channing and Rödel 2019). The advertisement call of Conraua goliath is a high frequency sound of long duration (4.1 kHz, and up to 1.5 minutes; Pawley and Hutchison 1989; Hutchison 1998; Amiet and Goutte 2017). Strangely, claims were made in jest during the early 20th-century that this very large frog might have a high frequency call (Claybird and Wanawiwi 1939), and this appears to be the case. Similar to C. crassipes, the advertisement call of C. goliath is produced with the mouth open (Hutchison 1998).
In captivity, males have been observed to exhibit territorial behaviors including lunges at one another, wrestling venter to venter, and biting (Pawley and Hutchison, 1989). These may be sometimes accompanied by vocalizations varying between guttural calls (1.6 – 2.3 kHz) and high-frequency squeaks (4.5 – 5.8 kHz) (Pawley and Hutchison 1989; Hutchison, 1998). These interactions were only observed during the day and ranged from occurring once per week to as rarely as every three or four months.
Trends and Threats
Relation to Humans
Possible reasons for amphibian decline
General habitat alteration and loss
The phylogenetic affinities of C. goliath with respect to other species in the genus remain unresolved as there is no comprehensive analysis of Conraua. Recent phylogenomic analysis have recovered Conrauidae, which contains only the genus Conraua, as the sister lineage of the Petropedetidae (Feng et al. 2017; Yuan et al. 2019). Conrauidae and Petropedetidae are, in turn, sister to the Pyxicephalidae.
Since their discovery, goliath frogs have proved fascinating to scientists and the public alike (Boulenger 1906 - Proceedings; Krüger, 1912), inspiring work both in the field and at zoos and aquaria (Gewalt, 1976, 1977; Pawley, 1987) and many popular articles (Sabater-Pi, 1962, 1967, 1972; Zahl, 1967; Ruoso, 2018). Some of what we know of the basic biology of these large, charismatic frogs is due to the study of captive animals (e.g., Pawley and Hutchison, 1989; Hutchison, 1998).
Hutchison (1998) found C. goliath to have a somewhat lower metabolic rate than other ranoid frogs. The volume of air brought in during a breath is typically small, but the frogs take frequent breaths and oxygen uptake is higher than other frogs of similar mass.
Several recent videos highlighting behaviors in Conraua goliathConraua goliath in the wild [in Spanish]:
Conraua goliath guarding nest in the wild:
Amiet, J.-L. (1986). ''La batrachofaune sylvicole d’un secteur forestier du Cameroun: la région de Yaoundé.'' Mémoires du Muséum national d’histoire naturelle, Sér. A., Zoologie, 132, 29–42.
Amiet, J.-L., Goutte, S. (2017). Chants d'amphibiens du Cameroun. Locus Solus Publishing House, Chateaulin, France. [link]
Boulenger, G. A. (1906). ''Descriptions of new batrachians discovered by Mr. G.L. Bates in South Cameroon.'' Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 7, 17, 317-323.
Boulenger, G.A. (1906). ''Exhibition of a specimen of, and remarks upon, a giant frog from Cameroon.'' Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, [link]
Channing, A., Rödel, M.-O. (2019). . Struik Nature, Cape Town, South Africa.
Feng, Y.-J., Blackburn, D.C., Liang, D., Hillis, D.M., Wake, D.B., Cannatella, D.C., Zhang, P. (2017). ''Phylogenomics reveals rapid, simultaneous diversification of three major clades of Gondwanan frogs at the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary.'' Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 114(29), E5864-E5870. [link]
Gewalt, W (1976). ''Der 1000-Dollar-Frosch aus Kamerun.'' Tier, 16(11), 8-11.
Gewalt, W. (1977). ''Einige Bemerkungen über Fang, Transport und Haltung des Goliathfrosches (Conraua goliath Boulenger).'' Zoologische Garten, Neue Folge, Jena, 47(3/4), 161–192.
Herrmann, H.-W., Böhme, W., Herrmann, P.A., Plath, M., Schmitz, A., Solbach, M. (2005). ''African biodiversity hotspots: the amphibians of Mt. Nlonako, Cameroon.'' Salamandra, 41(1/2), 61–81.
Herrmann, H.-W., Edwards, T. (2006). ''Conraua goliath: skittering locomotion.'' Herpetological Review, 37(2), 202–203. [link]
Hutchison, V.H. (1998). The Goliath Frog (Conraua goliath): physiological ecology of the largest anuan. Extended abstracts of the 1998 International Symposium on Animal Adaptation, Institute of Zoology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China. 5 pp.
Krüger, B. (1912). ''Zur Kenntnis des grössten lebeden Frosches, Rana goliath.'' Blgr. Blätter für Aquarien- und Terrarien-Kunde, 23(24), 383.
Lamotte, M. and Perret, J.-L. (1968). ''Revision du genre Conraua Nieden.'' Bulletin de l’Institut fondamental d’Afrique noire, Série A, 30, 1603-1644.
Lamotte, M., Perret, J.-L. and Dzieduszycka, S. (1959). ''Contribution Ã l'Ã©tude des batraciens de l'Ouest Africain IX. Les formes larvaires de Petropedetes palmipes, Conraua goliath et Acanthixalus spinosus.'' Bulletin de l'Institut fondamental d'Afrique noire, SÃ©rie A, 21, 762-776.
Lasso, C.A., Rial, A.I., Castroviejo, J., De la Riva, I. (2002). ''Herpetofauna del Parque Nacional de Monte Alén (Río Muni, Guinea Ecuatorial).'' Graellsia, 58(2), 21–34. [link]
Notas sobre la ecología de la Rana Gigante de Río Muni (Conraua goliath, Boulenger) (1967). ''.'' Zoo, 1967, 24–25.
Pawley, R. (1987). ''The management of the Goliath Frog, Conraua goliath: a goliath problem?'' Bulletin of the Chicago Herpetological Society, 22(5), 96–97.
Pawley, R., Hutchison, V.H. (1989). ''Territorial behavior and vocalizing in the Goliath Frog, Conraua goliath, in the Chicago Zoological Park.'' Abstracts of the First World Congress of Herpetology, Canterbury, UK.
Perret, J.-L. (1957). ''Observations sur Rana goliath.'' Blgr. Bulletin de la Société Neucthâteloise des Scienes Naturelles, 80, 195–202.
Perret, J.-L. (1960). ''Études herpétologiques africaines II.'' Bulletin de la Société Neucthâteloise des Scienes Naturelles, 83, 93–100.
Perret, J.-L. and Mertens, R. (1957). ''Étude d’une collection herpétologique faite au Cameroun de 1952 á 1955.'' Bulletin de l’Institut fondamental d’Afrique noire, Série A, 19, 548-601.
Ruoso, Cyril. “Taking Down Goliath.” Biographic.com, 8 Mar. 2018, www.biographic.com/posts/sto/taking-down-goliath.
Sabater-Pi, J. (1972). ''Der größte Frosch der Erde ist ein fast unbekanntes Tier.'' Das Tier, 1972, 36–37.
Sabater-Pi, J. (1985). ''Contribution to the biology of the Giant Frog (Conraua goliath, Boulenger).'' Amphibia-Reptilia, 6(2), 143-153.
Schäfer, M., Tsekané, S.J., Tchassem, F.A.M., Drakulić, S., Kameni, M., Gonwouo, N.L., Rödel, M.-O. (2019). ''Goliath frogs build nests for spawning – the reason for their gigantism?'' Journal of Natural History, 53(21–22), 1263–1276. [link]
Yuan, Z.-Y., Zhang, B.-L., Raxworthy, C.J., Weisrock, D.W., Hime, P.M., Jin, J.-Q., Lemmon, E.M., Lemmon, A.R., Holland, S.D., Kortyna, M.L., Zhou, W.-W., Peng, M.-S., Che, J., Prendini, E. (2019). ''Natatanuran frogs used the Indian Plate to step-stone disperse and radiate across the Indian Ocean.'' National Science Review, 6, 10–14. [link]
Zahl, P.A. (1967). ''In quest of the world’s largest frog.'' National Geographic Magazine, 132(1), 146–152.
Written by David C. Blackburn (dblackburn AT flmnh.ufl.edu), University of Florida
First submitted 2001-02-26
Edited by Ann T. Chang (2019-11-04)
Species Account Citation: AmphibiaWeb 2019 Conraua goliath: Goliath frog <http://amphibiaweb.org/species/4691> University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. Accessed Nov 20, 2019.
Feedback or comments about this page.
Citation: AmphibiaWeb. 2019. <http://amphibiaweb.org> University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. Accessed 20 Nov 2019.
AmphibiaWeb's policy on data use.