Diagnosis: N. anomalus may be identified by its tan coloration compared to the green ground color in other Centrolenid frogs. It has a tan dorsum with more ocelli than several other centrolenids. It can be distinguished from Cochranella ocellifera by its lack of extensive webbing, having a truncate snout and somewhat visible tympanum. It is differentiated from N. cochranae by its lack of prevomerine teeth (Cisneros-Heredia and McDiarmid 2007; Lynch and Duellman 1973).
Description: The male has a snout-vent length of 24.1 mm; Its head, with large protuberant eyes, is somewhat wider than the rest of its body width and is one-third of the snout-vent length. It has a truncate snout when seen from above and from the side. It has a round canthus and a concave loreal region. Its lips do not flare, and its nostrils are almost terminal on its snout. Located near the mouth margin, the choanae are small and egg-shaped. The tongue is not notched posteriorly. The vocal slits extend from the tongue base to the jaw angles. It lacks prevomerine teeth, has white bones, has a parietal peritoneum, and has a clear visceral peritoneum. The skin of the frog’s dorsum bears elevated warts and is dotted with spicules. On the ventral side, the belly and thighs are granular and the other areas are smooth. The supratympanic fold is weak, covering less than one-third of the tympanum. The lower two-thirds are visible and oriented posterolaterally with dorsal inclination. The hind legs are slender, and slightly over half the snout-vent length. The inner metatarsal tubercle is large and elongate in contrast with the outer metatarsal tubercle, which is small and round. The frog has webbing between outer fingers and on the feet, no webbing between the first and second fingers, and vestigial webbing between the second and third toes. Lateral fringes exist on the fingers. Finger and toe discs are round and truncate, larger on the fingers than on the toes, and subarticular tubercles are large and round. The first finger is longer than the second, whereas the fourth finger is nearly equal in length to the third (Lynch and Duellman 1973).
Coloration: The individual collected was tan with black ocelli enclosing orange-tan centers. The ocelli are located on top of elevated warts. When preserved, dorsal coloring looks darker and ocelli centers are white. The ventral side is creamy tan (Lynch and Duellman 1973).
Distribution and Habitat
Country distribution from AmphibiaWeb's database: Ecuador
The species has been seen once in a cloud forest at Río Azuela, Napo Province in northern Ecuador at 1,740 m above sea level. It is thought that it has a limited distribution and lives near flowing water, based on the location it was found (Coloma and Santiago 2004; Lynch and Duellman 1973).
Trends and Threats
N. anomalus has not been observed since its discovery in 1971. The species is thought to be in decline due to agricultural use of its forest habitat (Coloma and Santiago 2004).
Possible reasons for amphibian decline
General habitat alteration and loss
Habitat modification from deforestation, or logging related activities
Intensified agriculture or grazing
N. anomalus was first described by Lynch and Duellman (1973)
The species is a member of the family Centrolenidae, the glass frogs. It has been placed in the genus Nymphargus based on morphological characteristics (Cisneros-Heredia and McDiarmid 2007).
The species name “anomalus” comes from the Greek word, “anomalos,” meaning uneven or irregular because of the unusual tan color of N. anomalus (Lynch and Duellman 1973).
N. anomalus is also known as Cochranella anomala (Coloma and Santiago 2004).
Cisneros-Heredia, D. F., and McDiarmid, R. W. (2007). ''Revision of the characters of Centrolenidae (Amphibia: Anura: Athesphatanura), with comments on its taxonomy and the description of new taxa of glassfrogs.'' Zootaxa, 1572, 1-82.
Frost, D. (2011). Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 5.5.
Lynch, J.D. and Duellman, W.E. (1973). ''A review of the centrolenid frogs of Ecuador, with descriptions of new species.'' Occasional Papers of the Musem of Natural History, University of Kansas, (16), 1-66.
Stuart, S., Hoffmann, M., Chanson, J., Cox, N., Berridge, R., Ramani, P., and Young, B. (eds) (2008). Threatened Amphibians of the World. Lynx Edicions, IUCN, and Conservation International, Barcelona, Spain; Gland, Switzerland; and Arlington, Virginia, USA.
Written by Emily McCloskey, Karin Dove, and Travis Winter (eamccloskey AT ucdavis.edu, kldove AT ucdavis.edu, tvwinter AT ucdavis.ed), UC Davis
First submitted 2011-04-21
Edited by Mingna (Vicky) Zhuang (2012-03-22)
Feedback or comments about this page.
Citation: AmphibiaWeb: Information on
amphibian biology and conservation. [web application]. 2015. Berkeley, California:
(Accessed: May 29, 2015).
AmphibiaWeb's policy on data use.